Rees Morrison has consulted to more than 250 law departments during the past 21 years to help them better manage themselves and their outside counsel. A lawyer, CMC, author of six books and 150+ articles, former partner at three legal consulting firms and now independent (Rees Morrison Associates), Rees welcomes hearing from you: Rees(at)ReesMorrison.com or 973.568.9110. All posts (C) 2005-9 Rees W. Morrison.

Archive by Month


Archive by Category

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.

« Honesty/transparency as a valued quality in law firms when insurers select firms | Main | Patronizing attitudes of law firm partners »

Do “retention” and “engagement” mean the same thing when law departments hire law firms?

The pedant in me stubbornly insists that English has no exact synonyms, so off to the sophistry of hair splitting I must go. If “retention” carries with it a notion of a retainer – an amount paid each month against which fees are charged, then perhaps an “engagement” is simpler: “We hired you to represent us.” Then, oh readers who enjoy the rabbit hole into verbal Wonderland, what sorts out “engage” from “hire”? The former sounds snootier; hire sounds like day workers.

Posted on October 30, 2006 at 09:44 PM in Outside Counsel Mgt. | Permalink

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment