Rees Morrison has consulted to more than 250 law departments during the past 21 years to help them better manage themselves and their outside counsel. A lawyer, CMC, author of six books and 150+ articles, former partner at three legal consulting firms and now independent (Rees Morrison Associates), Rees welcomes hearing from you: Rees(at)ReesMorrison.com or 973.568.9110. All posts (C) 2005-9 Rees W. Morrison.

Archive by Month


Archive by Category

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.

« How to identify pockets of non-users of your law department | Main | Cottage industry: economic analysis for cases and experts to testify about it »

From boring commodity through comfort zone to scary, novel and risky situations

Every in-house lawyer faces a column of legal work. At the lowest layer is the hum-drum incessant flow of ordinary legal services and advice (See my post of March 18, 2007 on commodity legal work being crucial to the business.). Commodity legal work is the stuff of process (See my posts of Feb. 6, 2007 with references cited.). It must be done, competently and diligently, but it hardly sets the heart to racing.

Above that tranche comes the Goldilocks legal work: not too hard, not too easy, but just right and fun and professionally satisfying. Lawyers enjoy this broad layer of work and feel confident that they can do well and guide their clients successfully. This work is solid, satisfying and stimulating. One’s heartbeat picks up.

A the top, outside the comfort zone of professional growth and competency in the middle, are the occasional legal heart attacks. The project is high-profile, risky, full of law not well known (See my post of Oct. 18, 2005 about the silliness of lawyers wanting to tackle rocket science all the time.). Outside counsel are on the scene, and in the conference rooms or late at night the heart races.

From the standpoint of law-department management, (1) those who distribute work need to appreciate this columnar view of workload, (2) departments need the right horses inside and out for its distribution of work, and (3) managers ought to take into account differences among lawyers with regard to the kinds of work coming into the department.

Posted on March 20, 2007 at 11:09 AM in Productivity | Permalink

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment