Rees Morrison has consulted to more than 250 law departments during the past 21 years to help them better manage themselves and their outside counsel. A lawyer, CMC, author of six books and 150+ articles, former partner at three legal consulting firms and now independent (Rees Morrison Associates), Rees welcomes hearing from you: Rees(at)ReesMorrison.com or 973.568.9110. All posts (C) 2005-9 Rees W. Morrison.

Archive by Month


Archive by Category

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.

« Carrying alignment to an extreme – no diplomas on walls and no lawyer titles | Main | Thoughts on quantifying “return on talent” by use of a talent index »

Benchmark data compares relative performance, which counts for more than absolute performance

An article in the McKinsey Quarterly, 2007 No. 1 at 77, notes perceptively that “in a competitive market economy, performance is fundamentally relative, not absolute.” It’s about how your company stacks up against its competitors. That’s true likewise for general counsel as to their management efforts. Law departments compete with other law departments in their industry.

More generally, a law department ought to benchmark itself against similarly-situation departments, because comparing its performance only to itself is absolute, not relative. Your law department can improve like gangbusters, but if everyone else is improving faster, your relative standing has dropped.

Some company’s base bonuses of their top executives on how well the share price or market cap fares against those of comparator companies. A similar test, using key benchmarks over perhaps a two-year period, could apply to general counsel.

Posted on April 16, 2007 at 07:43 AM in Metrics and Benchmarks | Permalink

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment