Rees Morrison has consulted to more than 250 law departments (and several law firms) over 22 years to help them better manage themselves and their outside counsel. For more, visit reesmorrison.com, email me, or call 973.568.9110.

All posts (C) 2005-9 Rees W. Morrison.
If you would like a Metapost Plus: please email me with the name and I will send it.

Archive by Month


Archive by Category

Technorati Profile Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.

« Benchmark data compares relative performance, which counts for more than absolute performance | Main | Dreyer’s always uses ADR devices because disputes grow and metastasize unnecessarily »

Thoughts on quantifying “return on talent” by use of a talent index

No one has devised a solid, generally-accepted methodology to measure talent in a law department. One approach is to ferret out several indicators of quality and create an index (See my posts of May 17, 2006 about a litigation index; Aug. 28, 2005 on a client satisfaction index; Aug. 14, 2005 on a trademark index; and Sept. 10, 2005 on an overall law department performance index.).

Some components of such an index might include: CLE spending per lawyer; the quality ranking of law schools attended by the lawyer team, using the results from U.S. News & World Report; years the lawyers spent at an NLJ 250 law firm; dollars invested per lawyer in knowledge management initiatives; collegiality (See my post of Feb. 7, 2006 on the Group Development Questionnaire.); average tenure with the law department (See my post of Nov. 6, 2006 about job security.); articles published; bar leadership positions held; MBAs, LLMs and other post-graduate degrees granted; and percentage of lawyers who clerked after law school. Each component can be scored and weighted to create an index.

Posted on April 16, 2007 at 07:43 AM in Talent | Permalink

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment