Star-struck, or how do law departments handle high-potential (HiPo) lawyers

A highly-competent, high-performing lawyer can make a huge difference to a law department and indeed to a company (See my posts of Aug. 16, 2006 on super-lawyers; and March 16, 2006 on A-players.).

Many law departments try to identify very strong performers early and nurture them (See my posts of March 31, 2007 and three references cited; May 20, 2005 on the risks with a star; and May 7, 2006 on GE’s treatment of high-achieving lawyers.). In fact, succession programs are a muted and more comprehensive version of high-potential programs (See my posts of July 31, 2005 about succession planning; Jan. 4, 2006 on hallmarks of a robust performance management system; May 1, 2005 on sabbaticals and succession; Oct. 10, 2005 on internal competition.).

Special efforts in favor of a few are not without their problems (See my post of June 24, 2007on the pitfalls of high-potential programs.). The philosophical question has to do with the rightness of generally trying to raise all boats or investing in one or two to make them yachts.

We welcome comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *