• Rees Morrison has consulted to law departments for 20 years to help them better manage themselves and their outside counsel. A lawyer, CMC, author of six books, a partner at three legal consulting firms and now independent (Rees Morrison Associates), Rees welcomes comments here or by e-mail. All posts (C) 2005-8 Rees W. Morrison.
    Write Rees Morrison

« Policy at Dell to involve procurement on “higher spend relationships” with outside counsel | Main | How to measure a law department’s investments in knowledge »

Should law departments run internal e-discovery groups?

Ron Friedman, host of Prism Legal, minces no words in his November 5 post. He considers whether law firms should operate in-house significant e-discovery capabilities and concludes that they should not. “Personally, I would avoid the risk of mistakes and challenge of keeping up with ever-changing technology.” That reasoning applies to law departments that undertake e-discovery operations on their own. Additionally, it is hard to find and keep competent staff.

Ron then digs into a deeper consideration: “[S]hould law firms be in businesses other than law practice?” He thinks not. The same question could be asked of law departments who handle document collection, review and production.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.


  • Free Monthly E-mail Newsletter

  • An Affiliate of the Law.com Network

    From the Law.com Newswire

    Sign up to receive Legal Blog Watch by email
    View a Sample