Plan for the future, but be wary of strategic plans

Some law departments, usually larger ones, prepare a strategic plan (See my posts of May 14, 2005: tools execs use to improve the performance of their organizations.). Various techniques help general counsel craft a strategic plan (See my posts of Dec. 9, 2005: scenario thinking; Dec. 9, 2005: the Delphi method (nominal group technique); Dec. 20, 2005: real options analysis; Nov. 25, 2006: brainstorming; and Dec. 21, 2005: work analysis.).

I am all for managers of law departments thinking long and hard about their current resources compared to their anticipated needs. If that is strategic planning, then go for it! What I question are elaborate processes, PowerPoint, meetings of teams, and formalization of the output in large binders. I have expressed my doubts about the efficacy of elaborate strategic plans (See my posts of Oct. 10, 2005: defects in execution often drag down strategic plans; Dec. 15, 2005: “law-department strategic plan” is an oxymoron; and Jan. 17, 2006: strategic narratives in place of strategic plans.).

In general, the term “strategic” has been sorely overused (See my post of June 11, 2008.).

We welcome comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *