Competition in law departments

General counsel – indeed all managers, one hopes – want capable, ambitious people to report to them and a measure of competitiveness among them. Even so, they disapprove if competitive drives by those reports threaten the manager’s position (See my post of Jan. 18, 2007: general counsel fear usurpation; and April 30, 2006: reluctance of some to mentor potential challengers.). They mightily disapprove if jockeying for position and recognition throws monkey wrenches into team effectiveness (See my post of Oct. 10, 2005: competition among direct reports; and April 16, 2007: passed-over lawyers.).

Competition between lawyers can crop up everywhere in a law department (See my post of June 6, 2008: differences between non-cooperation, competition, conflict, and sabotage; Aug. 5, 2005: competition over who should manage business-unit litigation; Dec. 10, 2005: positional goods; June 24, 2007: career path quagmire; March 16, 2008: a game theoretic view of competition between lawyers; April 20, 2008: gender differences; April 22, 2008: competition through mind-enhancing drugs; May 29, 2008: “competitive arousal” situations; Dec. 23, 2005: racehorses in paddocks; and Feb. 28, 2006: the desirability of an officer title.).

Unhealthy competition can degenerate into withholding information or resources that would help someone else do better (See my post of Jan. 17, 2006: passive-aggressive behavior; and Feb. 9, 2008: silos that keep to themselves.). Unbridled competition unleashes open conflict (See my post of May 2, 2007: political fights stress the newly promoted; Jan. 20, 2007: task and relationship conflicts; and June 5, 2007: virulent politics.). Sabotage takes competition to a deliberately destructive level (See my post of Oct. 24, 2006 on rumors; and April 13, 2007 #4 on gossip.).

Competition brings out the best in some people, but unhinges others (See my post of June 12, 2005: causes of in-house stress; Sept. 10, 2005: internal time tracking can increase competitiveness; Sept. 10, 2005: OK to have some B-players who have hit a plateau; and Oct. 18, 2005: no lawyer wants to do rocket science all the time.).

General counsel can themselves feel competitive with those above and below them (See my post of March 24, 2007: general counsel competing with former GC now promoted; June 16, 2007: co-general counsels; and Aug. 10, 2007: personality disorders among GCs.).

Not much that is explicit and practical can be said about how an in-house manager should deal with unwarranted competitive juices. It is unarguable that a manager should try to temper competition that has degenerated into dysfunction (See my post of June 5, 2007: office politics.). Also pablum is the exhortation to increase competition to the point where you maximize effort and results. Sigh, not much crunchiness in any recommendations.

We welcome comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *