Evaluations and assessments of law firms by publishers and others

A number of publications rate law firms according to various systems, and I have made observations about them generally (See my post of July 4, 2006: ranking sources of guidance on law firms; July 21, 2005: Zagat-style ratings for law firms; April 6, 2007: risks of crowd-hacking on evaluation systems; and Nov. 11, 2005: referrals and networks of firms.).

When managers in law departments want to find firms who might represent them, they can peruse these listings (See my post of June 9, 2008: various sources, including Best Lawyers, Chambers, SuperLawyers, Law Dragon and Avvo; Oct. 12, 2008: Executive Counsel and its methodology; Aug. 14, 2006: ratings of law firm websites; Jan. 25, 2008: Martindale Hubble ratings; Feb. 7, 2007 on several rating systems; Nov. 19, 2007: InsideCounsel offering; and Sept. 10, 2005: law firm size and ratings on league tables.).

One Response to Evaluations and assessments of law firms by publishers and others

We welcome comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *