« Rees Morrison’s Morsels #107 – additions to earlier posts and short takes | Main | Does any company limit a lawyer leaving to a firm that got lots of work from the department? »
What if a law department gave each attorney an allowance to pay for support?
Think for a moment. If you were general counsel and you opened a budget account for each of your lawyers with $20,000 and you told them they could pay an administrative assistant $30 an hour. Assuming three lawyers for every admin, each fully-used admin would make $50-60,000. Or, if some lawyers chose to use an admin for less time they can pocket any amount they spent less than $20,000.
Such an internal market, a shared service where clients can choose to use the service or not for a fee, would quickly demonstrate which admins work well and productively and which lawyers want or need admin services.
Right, problems pop up – all the difficulties that spring to mind. But the kernel of this proposition holds: use-based payments, meritocracy, and a free market based on real money.
Posted on June 24, 2009 at 09:32 AM in Talent | Permalink
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Hey Rees, ever consider spending some of that dough on librarians? Who do you think bails the attorneys out when they need a crucial piece of info that they can't find because they never learned how to do effective legal research? In fact, I don't think I've seen you post on the value of librarians... or maybe you don't find them valuable??
Posted by: Coco F. | Jun 24, 2009 3:23:30 PM
If an in-house counsel learned their firm was doing this - basically rewarding a lawyer for doing work himself rather than letting it find it's right staff level - they'd cry bloody murder. Lawyers should be incentivized to get their admins and paralegals to do as much as possible so they can focus on highest level/most valuable work.
Posted by: Brad Blickstein | Aug 7, 2009 8:42:20 PM
