More reasons why general counsel might put off submitting data for a benchmarking study

Having offered ten reasons for initial reluctance to participate in a benchmarking study, I realized disappointedly I have not exhausted the topic (See my post of Aug. 29: 2008: ten reasons some CLOs defer benchmark surveys.). In fairness to general counsel who decline to include their department’s data in a benchmark survey, here are six more excuses.

  1. Futile – they don’t believe they can change their department’s or company’s fundamentals, so why bother to learn about management metrics?
  2. Higher priorities – demands on their time and attention of other sorts take temporary precedence
  3. Not privy to all the data — feel they should be comprehensive and accurate even though close estimates are good enough
  4. Political opposition – people in the company might use the data against them or keep attacking their costs
  5. Mistrust of statistics – they think that benchmark metrics are too mathematically abstruse for their text-and-humanities mind to comprehend
  6. Not concerned enough about management – just practice good law, that matters more than managing the department effectively.

Justifications that are perhaps plausible but not persuasive!

We welcome comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *