By one rule of thumb, inside counsel are far too costly in relation to outside counsel

A supplement to Chapter 4 of Robert Haig’s Successful Partnering Between Inside and Outside Counsel (West) at 4.3 note 1, quotes an article from GC California Magazine (May 14, 2008). The article’s author, a former general counsel, wrote that “[s]ome businesspeople use a rule of thumb, based upon experience in other areas, that the cost of doing something inside the company should be approximately one-third the cost of obtaining the services outside the company.”

If that guideline holds, inside lawyers – at approximately $200 per hour fully loaded in US law departments – would be expected to use outside counsel who bill at something like $600 an hour (See my post of April 21, 2010: little change after inflation over several years in inside full costs; July 1, 2010: $214 an hour fully loaded.). Research shows that $350 an hour after discounts comes closer to the blended billing rate of outside counsel (See my post of June 2, 2010: CTTymetrix Real Rate Report.).

Put bluntly, for those who see the one-third rule as a baseline, either inside lawyers cost too much, outside lawyers bill too little per hour, or the economic relationship contravenes the rule of thumb.

We welcome comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *