Close

Articles Posted in Thinking

Updated:

Three observations about legal risk: subjective, power-laden, and poorly calculated

(1) Some people maintain that “risk” is not an independent something waiting to be measured. It is, instead, completely definitional, situational, cultural, and malleable. As part of this argument, think about all the ways a “legal risk” might be described: delay, money lost, reputation besmirched, time wasted, share value diminished,…

Updated:

Intelligence matters, not simply years of diligent practice, at the higher elevations of thinking

Much has been made about expertise being the payoff of 10,000+ hours of disciplined, thoughtful practice (See my post of June 12, 2005: Herbert Simon’s 10-year rule on expertise; July 15, 2005: how to increase “deep smarts.”; Nov. 6, 2006: effortful study over time, plus motivation; Jan. 18, 2007: concentrated…

Updated:

Deeper thinking, exploration of more pros and cons, can lead to less feeling of confidence in a decision

The more arguments you come up with to support your decision, the less confident you will be that the decision is correct. Doesn’t that disturb you, as someone who prides yourself on thinking honestly, objectively and thoroughly about what positions to take? Yet the psychological paradox has been well researched,…

Updated:

Don’t be held in place by the anchoring effect! Know when to weigh anchor!

Once a number is put on the table, it can exert an untoward effect on those around the table. The “anchoring effect” of the first number put forward in a negotiation or discussion powerfully, yet often unconsciously, shifts both sides closer to that number. Even wholly unrelated anchors weigh down…

Updated:

Causal thinking with stories compared to statistical thinking with numbers

Our evolution equipped us to create causal explanations for events much more readily than to grasp underlying statistical explanations, to use the terms of Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2011). Causal explanations, often in the form of a narrative, explain what has happened by people…

Updated:

Caution: recognize your System 1 reactions, refine them with System 2 thinking, and keep fit

An essential attribute of a good lawyer is the ability to think clearly. It appears, however, that whatever goes on inside a human’s brain when it is processing input has two radically different personas: an impulsive, intuitive, impressionable, pattern-creating function and a more deliberate, evaluative, orderly and demanding function. Hence…

Updated:

The allure of what psychologists call cognitive fluency: too simple explanations for a much more complex world

“Human beings tend to seek simple and neat explanations for a complex world.” Jochal Benkler explains in the Harvard Bus. Rev., July-Aug. 2011 at 84, that “cognitive fluency” is “the tendency to hold on to things that are simple to understand and remember.” Cognitive fluency may be at work in…