Published on:

One way a law department might narrow down the selection of M&A counsel

If a company wants to buy another company or has been approached by a company that wants to buy them, either company’s law department might like some guidance as to which law firm to retain. Since large deals announce the law firms representing both sides in mergers and acquisitions, companies compile the data. The New York Times published some of that data regarding M&A legal advisors through the second quarter of 2014 (July 1, 2014 at B8).
The firms are Allen & Overy; Blake, Cassels; Cleary Gottlieb; Davis Polk; Freshfields; Jones Day; Latham & Watkins; Simpson Thacher; Skadden, Arps; Slaughter and May; Sullivan & Cromwell; Willkie Farr; Wachtell, Lipton; Weil, Gotshal; and White & Case. Together, these fifteen firms accounted for a significant chunk of the nearly $1.77 trillion worth of deals announced in the first six months of 2014.
Let’s present the M&A data on leading law firms using graphs. The first graph shows the 15 law firms and the number of deals on which they have been retained.

deal.number
The next plot shows the same 15 law firms according to the value of the deals they have been engaged in during the same time period. The values are expressed in b illions of dollars. As can be seen, of the top three firms by numbers of deals handled, only one of them makes the top three by value of deals. Lots of relatively smaller deals earned them a place in this group of elite M&A firms, in other words.

deal.value

Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

One response to “One way a law department might narrow down the selection of M&A counsel”

  1. By analogy to Revenue Per Lawyer, the M&A deal stats might interestingly be cross-tabulated against size of firm and size of the M&A practice group. Dispersion might be different, and more informative of “quality” relevant to a GC’s selection of counsel, when viewed against the measure Deals (or Deal Dollars) Per M&A Lawyer.

    Very large firms do more deals just because they are bigger, though large M&A groups may be larger because they do good work.